2010 trend on criminal databases

2010 Trends in Screening–Trend Four:  The Movement over databases will pocket up again – the latest wrinkle is the proliferation of low-cost “do-it-yourself” websites and even Iphone apps

An ongoing vicinity of controversy in the screening industry is the use of commercially assembled national multi jurisdictional databases.  These databases are complied from numerous sources that will sell or make data available. By no means are these databases perfect and accurate, nor up-to-date.  Some results do not grant any additional identifiers beyond the first and last name.  As a result, a fantastic many criminals would come up as “clear.”  This is called a “fake negative.”  These databases are practically useless in states like New York and California, two large areas.  In Texas, the criminal data is also very hit and miss. 

Conversely, databases can result in a person being labeled a criminal when they are not.  That is a “fake positive.” 

In the hands of a professional background screening firm, these databases have significant value as an additional but secondary tool that can lead to further places to search.  But, the downside is that some employers want the database in rank without doing court searches, meaning that some people will be falsely labeled as criminal when they are not and some people will be falsely cleared as having no criminal record when they do.  

Under the FCRA, a screening firm has the option of reporting a database search without courthouse confirmation as long as the consumer gets a see at the same time about the search.  Over 120 background firms, but, and the Disorder of California (by statute), have disavowed this deal with.  See http://www.concernedcras.com/ 

Another fallout from these databases are consumer scams, where glide-by-night quick-buck artists have set up “background read-through” sites that merely revise ancient data at exorbitant prices.  And even of poorer quality, many of these sites do not make it crystal clear to employers that they must comply with the FCRA, or that the database results can be incomplete or inaccurate.  

The latest twist is that these data searches are now offered over “smart phones.” Given the problems with such data, it’s hard to see how someone on a date can really get much value from these database searches.  On the other hand, such applications have been labeled a “must have” for stalkers and sexual predators becsue these apps apparently include private data such as pocket up.  

One of the challenges facing the screening industry is to educate employers that these “do-it-yourself” sites are perilous and can embroil an employer in all sorts of problems.  The problems can include lawsuits form applicants whose civil Civil rights were violated, to victims whose injuries could have been prevented by a real background check. 

(Employment Screening Resources (ESR), a leading national online employment screening background firm, is releasing the ESR “Third Annual Top Ten Trends in the Pre-Employment Background Screening Industry” for 2010.   This is the FOURTH of the ten trends ESR will be tracking in 2010.  )

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.